FloQast Pricing: What Teams Actually Pay in 2026

FloQast Plans (and What Changed)

FloQast is a modular platform. You license the solution areas you need, and the total scales with that selection. The platform organizes around four solution areas:

• Optimize the Close: close management workflows, including task assignment, deadline tracking, sign-off management, and real-time visibility into close progress. FloQast Ops sits within this pillar and handles accounting operations outside the close, including accounts payable, payroll, and financial reporting processes.
• Automate the Close: reconciliation and journal entry workflows. Automated Reconciliations handles the standard balance-sheet tie-out process. AI Transaction Matching (AutoRec) is a separately priced add-on for high-volume matching. Journal Entry Management automates JE creation and posting to your ERP. The Request Agent handles automated data requests and is also sold as an add-on.
• Connected Compliance: a separate product covering SOX compliance management, internal audit workflows, risk management, and automated evidence collection. Priced independently from the core close platform.
• Integrated Record-to-Report: variance analysis and financial reporting. AI Variance Analysis surfaces drivers of change across accounts. The Intercompany module handles multi-entity consolidation.

Third-party buyer reports from Vendr and Coefficient reference three purchase tiers: Business, Corporate, and Enterprise. FloQast's pricing page does not name these tiers publicly.

FloQast Plans at a Glance

Plan names based on third-party buyer reports. FloQast does not publish plan tiers on its pricing page. Confirm inclusions during your sales conversation.

The bigger shift since you may have last looked: FloQast now positions itself as an Accounting Transformation Platform and has been shipping an AI layer on top of the core close products. FloQast Transform, released in March 2025, lets teams build, test, and deploy custom AI Agents using natural language, and the company launched named agents for journal entries and data transformation alongside it. ReMind was rebranded as the Request Agent in the same push.

Why this matters for pricing: as FloQast ships new functionality, the newer capabilities land as separately priced products and add-ons rather than folding into existing plans. Transform, AutoRec, the Request Agent, and Compliance Management all sit outside the base subscription. When you scope a deal, you are deciding how much of that newer layer you want and budgeting for the likelihood that the next release carries its own line item.

What FloQast Costs in 2026

Quotes are custom, based on the products you need, the number of entities, and your ERP. There is no published price list, so getting a number means booking a demo with their sales team.

What third-party buyer data shows:

• Entry-level: ~$12,000/year for small teams (Capterra, early 2026)
• Mid-market: $30,000 to $120,000/year depending on entity count (Vendr, 305 purchases)
• SMB average: $43,303/year (SpendHound, aggregated contract data)
• Per-user estimates: $125 to $150/user/month depending on plan tier. FloQast's pricing page frames it as "No Per-User Fees," but user count still factors into your quote
• Contract length: 2 to 3 years standard, annual billing only, no monthly option

Variables that drive FloQast pricing:

• Solution areas licensed: The single biggest lever; cost scales with how many products and add-ons you turn on
• Entity count: Deployments are scoped by legal entity, so multi-entity structures cost more
• User count: Not billed as a per-user fee, but headcount still shapes the quote
• ERP complexity: Your ERP environment drives both the subscription scope and the implementation fee
• Contract term: Multi-year commitments are the main lever for holding renewal increases down

If you are comparing a quote against the market, the useful move is to confirm which of these variables your quote is priced against, and whether the counts FloQast used match your actual footprint.

The Hidden Costs of FloQast

The subscription figure is the starting point, not the finish line. Here are the line items that catch teams off guard:

• Implementation: A one-time fee on top of the subscription. $5,000 to $15,000 for smaller teams and $30,000+ for enterprise deployments, depending on ERP complexity and entity count, per ITQlick and Vendr.
• Add-on modules: The Request Agent (formerly ReMind), AutoRec, and Compliance Management are not included in base plans. AutoRec alone runs $15,000 to $50,000+ annually depending on reconciliation volume and the number of accounts automated. A base plan quote and an all-in quote can look very different.
• Annual price increases: 3 to 7 percent at renewal, per Vendr buyer data. In documented cases, FloQast held firm on the increase unless the customer committed to a multi-year deal upfront.
• Auto-renewal: Contracts renew automatically. The cancellation window is typically 60 days before your renewal date, and missing it means another full term.
• No monthly billing: All contracts are annual subscriptions. Shorter terms are available but tend to cost more annually.

Negotiation tip: Buyers who bring a competitive alternative to the table and engage at least 90 days before renewal consistently land better terms, per Vendr negotiation data. The annual price increase is one of the most commonly negotiated line items.

Numeric prices differently. Teams choose the product lines they need, and reconciliation automation and transaction monitoring come inside Close Management instead of as separate add-ons. For teams whose evaluation is driven by those capabilities, the gap between base price and all-in price is worth running the numbers on.

What You Get for the Cost

For that investment, FloQast delivers a mature set of capabilities built around close coordination and reconciliation:

• Close checklist and task management: Real-time visibility into who owns what during the close, with deadline tracking, sign-off management, and an audit trail. The dashboard gives controllers a live view of close progress without chasing down team members over Slack.
• Automated Reconciliations: Standardized templates for balance-sheet tie-outs with adjustable workflows. Auto-certification handles reconciliations that fall below a set threshold, so reviewers focus on exceptions.
• Journal Entry Management: Centralized JE creation, approval, and posting to your ERP, with supporting documentation stored in the platform.
• AI Variance Analysis: Surfaces drivers of change across accounts so your team does not have to build that analysis from scratch after every close.
• FloQast Ops: Handles accounting operations outside the close, including AP, payroll, and financial reporting processes, within the same platform.
• Audit trail and compliance documentation: Every action is logged. For teams with SOX requirements or external auditors, this is one of the most consistently cited strengths in G2 reviews.

The review data backs up the coordination story. G2 rates FloQast 4.6 out of 5 across 1,411 reviews as of June 2026, and ease of use leads the positive feedback with 169 mentions. Task organization and close visibility follow with 98 mentions each. A Staff Accountant at a mid-market company noted the platform eliminated the need for separate Excel trackers by centralizing all monthly tasks in one place.

The catch shows up in the same reviews. Limited automation and flexibility is the top negative theme, mentioned by 48 reviewers, particularly among teams that need capabilities beyond standard close task management. Reconciliation rigidity is flagged by 26 reviewers, with standardized formats failing to accommodate entity-specific exceptions, which pushes teams back into parallel Excel trackers outside the system. FloQast does close coordination well. Where it runs into limits is when teams need close data to flow automatically into reporting, or when exceptions do not fit the standardized format.

Is FloQast Worth It?

FloQast is worth it for:

• Teams whose biggest bottleneck is close coordination: knowing who owns what, chasing sign-offs, and keeping an audit trail
• Organizations that need standardized reconciliation management with auto-certification below set thresholds
• Companies with SOX requirements that want every close action logged and audit-ready
• Teams already embedded in the FloQast ecosystem with established workflows

For those teams, the platform was built for their exact problem and it solves it well.

It tends to be a poor fit when:

• Your senior accountants are still rebuilding flux analysis in Excel after every close
• Controllers find variances during review instead of before the close window opens
• Reconciliation exceptions do not fit the standardized format, so parallel Excel trackers live outside the system
• You need transaction-level visibility mid-month, not after the fact

A common pattern behind that second list: sign-offs are complete in FloQast, and then someone spends two more days pulling account detail from the ERP to explain the variances the CFO asked about. FloQast manages the process, but it does not connect the data. That gap is where G2 reviewers most consistently flag limitations, and where teams tend to start evaluating FloQast alternatives.

If you recognize your team there, the question worth asking is what gets your team from BD10 to BD5: closing the books by the fifth business day instead of the tenth, since that is the number controllers and CFOs are graded on either way.

What Gets You From BD10 to BD5

Three things move that number, and they are worth checking any platform against, FloQast included:

• Real-time ERP sync at the transaction level, so variance questions get answered from live data instead of a two-day export exercise after sign-offs are done.
• AI that drafts the work. A flux explanation written and waiting for edits is worth more than a variance flagged for someone to write up later.
• Reconciliation automation that handles exceptions, not just the standardized happy path, so the work stays in the platform instead of leaking back into Excel.

FloQast clears the coordination bar cleanly. It strains on the data side: the tool that coordinates BD1 through BD5 is not always the one that gets you to BD5 in the first place.

That is the gap Numeric is built to close. Same close management foundation, connected to the data underneath it:

• AI flux commentary drafted from the GL. Instead of writing variance explanations by hand after every close, your team gets first-draft flux commentary generated directly from general ledger data, ready to edit.
• Transaction-level visibility, continuously. Transaction Monitors flag anomalies mid-month, so controllers catch issues before review instead of during it.
• AI reconciliation matching. Automated account reconciliations that handle high-volume matching and surface real exceptions, getting senior accountants out of the tie-out weeds.
• The same close foundation. Checklists, sign-offs, task management, and audit trail across the full month-end close workflow.
• MCP integration built in, so your team can trigger close workflows directly from the AI tools they already use. Read more about Numeric's MCP use cases.

Watch Numeric's Co-founder and CPO Anthony Alvernaz walk through how accounting teams are using MCP to orchestrate their close.

On pricing, Numeric organizes its plans around product lines. Close Management covers the close checklist, live ERP integrations, auto-reconciliation, flux analysis, transaction monitoring, and custom reporting. Teams can pair it with Cash Management or Billing and Revenue, and pricing scales with transaction volume and seats. Numeric scopes onboarding and data migration upfront, so you know the implementation cost before you sign.

Teams that later want to move their core accounting off the ERP can bring that data onto Numeric's ERP replacement, the Financial Data Platform, on their own timeline, with no single cutover required.

The proof is in the switch. DailyPay was spending significant time on manual work while using FloQast. After moving to Numeric, their team runs on AI-generated flux explanations and a less manual, more audit-ready close.

"By far, Numeric has the best service that I've ever seen in a similar platform...we're getting an ear and we're able to help change the platform over time which means that we both grow. You're not going to get that with FloQast, you're not going to get that with BlackLine."

— Sarah Hill, Controller at DailyPay

One more comparison worth naming: BlackLine sits at the other end of the spectrum. Third-party buyer data puts the average BlackLine contract at $77,000/year, ranging up to $340,000 for larger deployments, built for enterprise organizations with complex multi-entity close and SOX requirements. For a full breakdown, see our BlackLine pricing guide and the FloQast vs BlackLine comparison.

FloQast Pricing: Bottom Line

FloQast is a well-built tool for what it is designed to do. If your team needs a shared close checklist, real-time task visibility, and a clean audit trail, it delivers on all three, and the G2 numbers back that up.

The question is whether that is enough. For teams where the close is getting more complex, where the CFO wants variance explanations faster, and where reconciling high-volume accounts takes days instead of hours, FloQast keeps the close organized while the analysis behind it still lands on your senior accountants. It is built around coordinating the close, not automating what happens inside it.

If your team needs that next layer, Numeric is worth a direct comparison. It covers the same close management foundation and adds AI flux, reconciliation automation, and live ERP data so your team stops pulling the same analysis together by hand every month. Schedule a demo to see how it stacks up against your actual workflow.

Frequently Asked Questions